Tuesday, June 1, 2010

The Third Western Hemispheric Conference on Port Security

Excerpt from U.S. Coast Guard “Proceedings of the Marine Safety & Security Council” magazine by LTJG Katie Stanko, U.S. Coast Guard Inspection & Investigations Staff, Seventh Coast Guard District.


The ISPS Code was written by many larger countries with major ports and facilities in response to the devastating terrorist acts of September 11, 2001. Smaller maritime-dependent nations throughout the Western Hemisphere met these steep mandates through a combination of ingenuity and best practices that have drastically improved the region’s maritime transportation system.

The Inter-American Committee on Ports (CIP) initiated hemispheric conferences on port security to encourage Organization of American States (OAS) member nations to discuss the state of security in their respective ports and share best practices for port security.

More than 200 delegates attended a recent conference, including the director of the Specialized Body of Port Security from the Dominican Republic, the chair of the Executive Board for the Inter-American Committee on Ports, the assistant secretary general of OAS, and International Maritime Organization representatives, along with various other senior personnel from the private and public sectors of their respective nations. U.S. delegates included Maritime Administration, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Coast Guard, and state partnership program representatives.

In the photo foreground is Mr. Sean Connaughton, MARAD administrator and head of delegation for the United States. Also pictured is RDML Kevin Cook, U.S. Coast Guard, second row.

The State of Security and Best Practices
The conference primarily focused on the OAS member nations reporting the state of security in their respective ports and their best practices. In addition, several key international organizations presented on the state of port security international standards and regulations from a global perspective. Seven regional port terminals were highlighted as leaders in technological advances and implementation techniques:


  • Manzanillo International Terminals, Republic of Panama;

  • APM Terminal Limited, Kingston, Jamaica;

  • Puerto Multimodal Caucedo, Dominican Republic;

  • Puerto Barrios, Guatemala;

  • Puerto de Veracruz, Mexico;

  • Puerto de Buenos Aires, Argentina;

  • Haina International Terminal, Dominican Republic.

Additionally, four of the seven ports highlighted (Manzanillo, Kingston, Caucedo, and Buenos Aires) have been certificated by Customs and Border Protection as “container security initiative ports” because they implemented a security regime to ensure all containers that pose a potential terrorism risk are identified and inspected in their ports before they are placed on vessels destined for the United States.

The U.S. Coast Guard international port security officer highlighted specific best practices, as observed in various countries throughout the region, including using Internet-based worker access cards, command control TV surveillance systems, and implementing mandatory training for workers.

The Way Forward
As port security continues to improve throughout the Western Hemisphere, it is clear that the private sector will make port security essential to its business plan, picking those ports that have the best security to remain competitive in the shipping market.

The logical next step is to improve partnerships. Leveraging government-to-government contacts will especially help those nations with small law enforcement agencies and little maritime background.

Additionally, organizations such as the Caribbean Shipping Association have been committed to improving and effectively enforcing the safety and security of the ports in the region. Leveraging these industry connections is vital to enabling the Western Hemisphere to build a framework of successful port security programs.


For more information:
Full article and “Interagency Success Stories” edition of USCG Proceedings is available at http://www.uscg.mil/proceedings/spring2009.

Subscribe online at http://www.uscg.mil/proceedings/subscribe.asp.

Direct requests for print copies of this edition to: HQS-DG-NMCProceedings@uscg.mil.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comment Policy

We welcome your comments on postings at all Coast Guard sites/journals. These are sponsored by the U.S. Coast Guard to provide a forum to talk about our work providing maritime safety, security and stewardship for the American people to secure the homeland, save lives and property, protect the environment, and promote economic prosperity.

Please note: Anonymous comments have been disabled for this journal. It is preferred that you use your real name when posting a comment. WE WILL POST THE NAME YOU ENTER WHEN YOU SUBMIT YOUR COMMENT. Also, you are welcome to use Open ID or other user technologies that may be available.

All comments submitted are moderated and will be reviewed before posting. The Coast Guard retains the discretion to determine which comments it will post and which it will not. We expect all contributors to be respectful. We will not post comments that contain personal attacks of any kind; refer to Coast Guard or other employees by name; contain offensive terms that target specific ethnic or racial groups, or contain vulgar language. We will also not post comments that are spam, are clearly off topic or that promote services or products.

We will make our best effort to promptly post those comments that are consistent with the Comment Policy, but given the need to manage federal resources, moderating and posting of comments will usually occur only during regular business hours, Monday through Friday. Comments submitted outside of business hours will be read and posted as quickly as possible.