The Participant “Hot Wash”
This meeting is typically held immediately following the event. Holding it at the functional area of play enables participants to come together to hear about challenges.
This also is a good time to distribute and collect participant feedback forms. All feedback, whether positive or recommendations for improvement, will aid planners as they design exercises or prepare for actual events.
The Controller and Evaluator Debrief
This event may be held directly after the participant hot wash. The primary focus is to discuss and review the controller’s and evaluator’s observations on how responses to exercise events played out.
The debrief should focus on answering questions such as:
- What response actions were triggered at the start of the event?
- Were problems encountered that complicated coordinating resources?
- Did agencies have a notification system in place?
- Were contingency plans used to address what actions were required?
- Did the contingency plans cover the specific event, or were there gaps?
An exercise should not be looked at as a “pass” or “fail” event, but as a method to determine if all aspects of response efforts were addressed. It is also an opportunity to identify issues for corrective action prior to an actual incident.
Additionally, meeting organizers must reiterate the importance of writing complete and comprehensive exercise evaluation guides and establish a due date for the evaluators to submit them to the lead evaluator.
Vetting and Approval
An after-action conference should be scheduled within one month after the exercise. This conference’s outcomes are to solicit feedback for edits to the AAR, develop the improvement plan, and assign a responsible party and due date for each corrective action.
The plan should be a realistic and prioritized list of corrective actions required to improve preparedness. It’s important to note that the improvement plan may only be the first step. Some items may require additional funding or necessitate developing agreements among agencies that share responsibilities or resources during a response.
For more information:
Full article is available at http://www.uscg.mil/proceedings/fall2009.
Subscribe online at http://www.uscg.mil/proceedings/subscribe.asp.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment Policy
We welcome your comments on postings at all Coast Guard sites/journals. These are sponsored by the U.S. Coast Guard to provide a forum to talk about our work providing maritime safety, security and stewardship for the American people to secure the homeland, save lives and property, protect the environment, and promote economic prosperity.
Please note: Anonymous comments have been disabled for this journal. It is preferred that you use your real name when posting a comment. WE WILL POST THE NAME YOU ENTER WHEN YOU SUBMIT YOUR COMMENT. Also, you are welcome to use Open ID or other user technologies that may be available.
All comments submitted are moderated and will be reviewed before posting. The Coast Guard retains the discretion to determine which comments it will post and which it will not. We expect all contributors to be respectful. We will not post comments that contain personal attacks of any kind; refer to Coast Guard or other employees by name; contain offensive terms that target specific ethnic or racial groups, or contain vulgar language. We will also not post comments that are spam, are clearly off topic or that promote services or products.
We will make our best effort to promptly post those comments that are consistent with the Comment Policy, but given the need to manage federal resources, moderating and posting of comments will usually occur only during regular business hours, Monday through Friday. Comments submitted outside of business hours will be read and posted as quickly as possible.