Excerpt from U.S. Coast Guard “Proceedings of the Marine Safety & Security Council” magazine. By CAPT Vince Atkins, former commander, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Honolulu, and ENS Meghan Hough, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Honolulu.
Hawaii Superferry (HSF) came to Hawaii to start a high-speed ferry service between the Hawaiian islands of Oahu, Maui, and Kauai. The Superferry vessel, the Alakai, is a 350-foot high-speed catamaran designed to carry 866 passengers and 282 vehicles.
A Hostile Operating Environment
Citizens and environmental groups opposed to this new service voiced several concerns, citing Alakai’s lack of an environmental impact study, the possibility of increased traffic congestion, and the potential for introducing invasive species and harming marine life.
Alakai’s initial operations were greeted by an estimated 300 protestors in Kauai, endangering public safety at sea and ashore. USCG Station Kauai’s small boat is shown removing protesters on surfboards from the path of the Alakai into Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai. The crowd forced the HSF facility to close its gates due to security concerns and, due to continuing public unrest, HSF decided to temporarily halt its Kauai operations altogether.
As the courts wrestled with the legalities of the situation, law enforcement agencies had to prepare for the ferry’s possible return to full service and the subsequent widespread civil disturbances it could cause ashore and in the harbors.
Unique Challenges
Federal, state, and local authorities faced the challenge of balancing seemingly contradictory objectives: upholding the law, ensuring public safety, ensuring the safe arrival and departure of the ferry in multiple ports and jurisdictions, and protecting and promoting constitutional freedoms. Information sharing was critical for successful operations, and for them to be viewed with the broadest scope—not just as an exchange among government agencies, but with the public at large.
Achieving Interagency Alignment
The Coast Guard; its port partners; and various county, state, and federal government officials routinely worked together on a number of committees, at exercises, and during other operational incidents to understand and align the various legal authorities and jurisdictional concerns.
The mechanism that provided for information sharing and interagency alignment was a unified command structure consistent with the National Incident Management System. The Incident Command System (ICS) provides an organizational structure and process wherein agencies with differing authorities, competencies, and equities may come together to work toward a common goal. The operational challenges, varying agency concerns, and differing agency capabilities were laid bare and discussed thoroughly during the frequent meetings of the unified command.
Execution of the Operation
The unified command worked together to develop a plan that recognized differing authorities and competencies. The two operations/groups (onshore and waterborne security operations) created an overall plan designed to reduce the number of on-water protesters, provided a pre-designated protest zone, and developed coordinated methods to deal with illegal and unsafe protests. The coordinated plan also required a temporary fixed security zone to ensure the safety of the vessel and its passengers.
Operational Success
The implementation of the new security/protest zone required extensive public affairs efforts to ensure the affected maritime stakeholders and ocean recreation community understood the scope of the security regulations. To increase compliance, the unified command formed a joint public information staff to meet with the public to outline security zone boundaries and explain the legal consequences of violating the zone. Public outreach proved successful in deterring a large number of protesters from illegally entering the on-water security zone.
It’s important to note that the intended result of this information sharing process and interagency collaboration was not to change the protestors’ opinions regarding the ferry operation.
In this instance, information sharing achieved its intended goals: allowing the Alakai to transit in and out of Maui without incident, allowing protestors to voice their dissent, and helping agencies to make the best use of unique authorities and competencies.
The complexities of maritime operations are often compounded by factors such as the variability of the sea itself, differing and sometimes overlapping legal authorities, and the presence of a wide range of concerned agencies with varying competencies and capabilities. Information sharing reduces operational complexity and sets the stage for success.
For more information:
Full article and “Focus on Safety” edition of USCG Proceedings is available at www.uscg.mil/proceedings. Click on “archives” and then “2008 Vol. 65, Number 2” (Summer 2008).
Subscribe online at http://www.uscg.mil/proceedings/subscribe.asp.
Online survey available at: http://www.uscg.mil/proceedings/survey.asp.
Direct requests for print copies of this edition to: HQS-DG-NMCProceedings@uscg.mil.
A discussion forum on Marine Safety, Recreational Boating Safety, and waterways managment as we work together to protect maritime commerce and mobility, the marine environment, and safety of life at sea.
Wednesday, December 23, 2009
The Hawaii Superferry—information sharing leads to operational success
Posted by
Editor Sarah Webster, at USCG Proceedings of the MSSC (DCO-84)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Topics
- acrylonitrile
- Aids to Navigation
- AMSEA
- Anhydrous Ammonia
- Automatic Identification System
- Auxiliary
- Benkert
- Boat Accidents
- Boat U.S.
- Boating Improvements
- Boating Safety
- Boating Safety Enhancement
- Boy Scouts of America
- BUI
- Calicchio
- campaign
- Champion's Point of View
- Champion’s Point of View
- chemical
- Chemical of the Quarter
- Citizen's Action Network
- Coast Guard
- Coast Guard Authorization Act
- Coast Guard Auxiliary
- COLREGS
- Combating Piracy
- commercial fishing
- commercial fishing safety
- deck
- derelict vessels
- digital edition
- Director’s Perspective
- e-Navigation
- education
- engineering
- Environmental Protection
- fatalities
- fishing safety training
- Fishing Vessel Safety
- fishing vessels
- fleet
- Flotation
- Global Supply Chain
- HIstory
- Icebreaking
- information managers
- Information Technology
- International Maritime Organization
- Investigations and Analysis
- Leadership
- legislation
- Lessons Learned
- life jackets
- lifesaving equipment
- Marine Inspectors
- Marine Safety
- Marine Safety Enhancement
- Marine Safety Performance Plan
- Marine Transportation System
- Merchant Mariners and Credentials
- National Recreational Boating
- navigation
- navigational safety
- New Orleans
- non-profit
- Paddle Sports
- Partnerships
- Partnerships and Outreach
- Pilotage
- Pollution Prevention
- Ports
- Prevention Professionals
- Proceedings
- queries
- Recreational Boating Safety
- Recreational Boating.
- Recruitment Efforts
- Regulations
- risk
- risk assessment
- safety
- Safety Afloat
- search and rescue
- Security
- swim
- Technology
- Tiger Team
- training
- training contract
- training programs
- trends
- tug
- United Safe Boasting Institute
- Updates and New
- Vessels
- virtual learning
- Water Safety
- Waterways
- Waterways Management
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(75)
-
▼
December
(10)
- Ask the MSSC - You have questions. We have answers...
- The Care and Handling of Liquefied Natural Gas
- The Hawaii Superferry—information sharing leads to...
- The International Trade Data System—a global data-...
- Creating a Culture of Information Sharing
- USCG Marine Safety Performance Plan Specific Safet...
- USCG Marine Safety Performance Plan Specific Safet...
- USCG Marine Safety Performance Plan Objectives—imp...
- USCG Marine Safety Performance Plan Objectives—imp...
- Upcoming in Proceedings
-
▼
December
(10)
USCG Sites and Blogs
- Homeport
- National Maritime Center
- National Vessel Documentation Center
- Coast Guard Auxiliary
- Boating Safety Division
- National Maritime Security Advisory Council
- Coast Guard Marine Information Exchange
- AMVER
- AMVER Blog
- Marine Safety Center
- Proceedings of the Marine Safety and Security Council
- Coast Guard
- iCommandant – Web Journal of Adm. Thad Allen
- CGLANT Director of Operations
- Coast Guard All Hands – MCPO-CG and MCPO-CGRF
- More blogs via USCG Compass Blogroll
Other CG Preventtion Relevant Sites and Blogs
- DHS Leadership Journal
- House CG&MT Subcommittee
- Senate Oceans, Atmosphere, Fisheries & CG Subcommittee
- Sec DOT's Blog
- Sec State Blog
- Committee for the Marine Transportation System
- Bryant's Maritime Blog
- CGBlog
- Int'l Chamber of Shipping
- gCaptain Blog
- Int'l Maritime Organization
- Journal of Commerce
- KennebecCaptain
- Lloyds List Blog
- Marine Log
- Marine Safety by 'Safety Doc'
- MarineLink - Coast Guard stories
- Maritime Executive
- Maritime Journal News
- Monitor by Dieselduck
- Off Soundings
- Professional Mariner
- Scuttlebutt (Fred's Place) - CG News
- Sea Fever
- Towmasters
Comment Policy
We welcome your comments on postings at all Coast Guard sites/journals. These are sponsored by the U.S. Coast Guard to provide a forum to talk about our work providing maritime safety, security and stewardship for the American people to secure the homeland, save lives and property, protect the environment, and promote economic prosperity.
Please note: Anonymous comments have been disabled for this journal. It is preferred that you use your real name when posting a comment. WE WILL POST THE NAME YOU ENTER WHEN YOU SUBMIT YOUR COMMENT. Also, you are welcome to use Open ID or other user technologies that may be available.
All comments submitted are moderated and will be reviewed before posting. The Coast Guard retains the discretion to determine which comments it will post and which it will not. We expect all contributors to be respectful. We will not post comments that contain personal attacks of any kind; refer to Coast Guard or other employees by name; contain offensive terms that target specific ethnic or racial groups, or contain vulgar language. We will also not post comments that are spam, are clearly off topic or that promote services or products. Posted comments will be in English. We are not able to post comments in other languages.
We will make our best effort to promptly post those comments that are consistent with the Comment Policy, but given the need to manage federal resources, moderating and posting of comments will usually occur only during regular business hours, Monday through Friday. Comments submitted outside of business hours will be read and posted as quickly as possible.
Please note: Anonymous comments have been disabled for this journal. It is preferred that you use your real name when posting a comment. WE WILL POST THE NAME YOU ENTER WHEN YOU SUBMIT YOUR COMMENT. Also, you are welcome to use Open ID or other user technologies that may be available.
All comments submitted are moderated and will be reviewed before posting. The Coast Guard retains the discretion to determine which comments it will post and which it will not. We expect all contributors to be respectful. We will not post comments that contain personal attacks of any kind; refer to Coast Guard or other employees by name; contain offensive terms that target specific ethnic or racial groups, or contain vulgar language. We will also not post comments that are spam, are clearly off topic or that promote services or products. Posted comments will be in English. We are not able to post comments in other languages.
We will make our best effort to promptly post those comments that are consistent with the Comment Policy, but given the need to manage federal resources, moderating and posting of comments will usually occur only during regular business hours, Monday through Friday. Comments submitted outside of business hours will be read and posted as quickly as possible.
This is an official United States Coast Guard posting for the Public's information.
Our posting does not endorse this site or anything on it, including links to other sites,
and we disclaim responsibility and liability for the site and its content.
3 comments:
Interesting that your article talks about "Execution of the Operation" and "Operational Success" [on Maui] regarding a "Hostile Operating Environment" [on Kauai], but the two were different situations. HSF did not have any 'operational success' going back into Kauai, and the Coast Guard never experienced any 'hostile operating environment' on this going into Maui. The two were two different situations.
It would have been more protective of public safety if the Coast Guard would or could have advised the ferry operators not to attempt an end-run against a court order and to give up on its confrontational voyage to Kauai.
In the end, those who protested in the water as well as those who chose other methods were vindicated, and Hawaii Superferry departed for good. That could not have been known at the time of the Kauai run, but there would have been no public safety issue at all had the ferry not attempted its profoundly unpopular voyage to Kauai.
Finally, the information sharing described in this article seems to have failed to differentiate between the Kauai and Maui activities. Maui never to my knowledge experienced any surfboard protests. Instead, the Maui choice was to go to court, where they were consistently successful.
In the end it was shown that HSF and the Unified Command ignored a legally binding Hawaii State Supreme Court decision issued days before HSF started its first operations. Just because the Governor and Hawaii AG told law enforcement it was legal, did not make it so.
The People were correct all along.
Post a Comment